As the title suggests, it is time to look at open source itself, open-source projects, open-source thinking, cryptocurrency open source, etc., from the perspective of an organization.
Open source itself is excellent, and it is very conducive to the progress and development of the business. Throughout history, more progress and development has been achieved by embracing open-source, sharing, and emancipating the mind.
Let’s take a simple and well-known example:
For instance, suppose, if I have an apple in my hand, and you have a pear. I am reluctant to share it with you, and you are unwilling to give it to me. Then I won’t be able to know the taste of pears, and you don’t know the taste of apples.
On the contrary, If I share you half and you will give me half, both of us can taste the apples and pears.
The same concept is true for open source.
When you look at open-source, you can’t just look at it from a single aspect. You may only see its goodness and unintentionally avoid the risks. Such a thing can bring you a lot of trouble in the future. If you only see its negative points, you can’t see its goodness. This can easily turn you into a frog at the bottom of the well.
The following occurrences can be easily explained from two major aspects.
- Advantages and benefits of open source
- Disadvantages and the risks of open source
Benefits and advantages of open source
There are countless benefits of open source software. A typical example is if you want to create a project with no existing framework. If you want to create a framework by yourself, you need a lot of time and energy. If the mature point of writing is a few as a few days and as many as a few months, then the project is anxious to complete, and you can’t wait for you to complete the framework. Go ahead and program it after development.
Then the benefits of open source are available. The open-source framework is ready to use out of the box. Moreover, there is also very complete documentation, exchange groups, and different mining experience sharing, which can be easily searched using various search engines.
Because it is open-source, there are multiple open source frameworks for you to choose from, and the advantages come again. You can easily select a framework that equals your technical ability, or you can also choose a framework with a creative and optimized interface, or you can also select a framework that everyone evaluates. A relatively high open-source framework.
Generally, it doesn’t take long to create an open-source framework. The fastest one may be created in a few minutes, and the slow one may take an hour, so it is quick and convenient.
Some open-source frameworks may also have technical exchange groups, exchange forums, etc. In such instances, whenever you encounter problems, you can discuss them with everyone and work collaboratively to resolve any issue you face.
In conclusion, it is:
- Out of the box
- Multiple choices
- Technical solution exchange
The risks and disadvantages of open source
Open-source programs cannot be totally considered as involving only the selection and development of the product development process. From an organizational perspective, open-source programming also involves legal intellectual property risks when programmes are sold in foreign countries, software architecture, software ecosystem, corporate R&D efficiency, talent competition, open standard construction methods, and commercial interests. Organizations are free to use multiple perspectives to understand the meaning of the value of the open-source.
Organizations look at open source from different perspectives:
- In regards to open source as a way of acquiring outsourcing elements or technology, the question that arises is: How to select the open source to accept new technologies? How to efficiently iterate management in the software life cycle process?
- In regards to open source as a way of external collaboration, the problem that arises is: acquiring external talents. Collaborating with programmers in the community and other organizations.
- In regards to open source as a means of development: the issue we see is how to make an impact in the technology field, in new technologies and business fields, how to use open source to stand at the forefront of organizational development and other issues.
According to a recent survey by Gartner and the Linux Foundation, more than 29% of the software code of organizations arrives from open source.
In the context of the Internet, the pro[ortonb of open source software is as high as 80%. However, massive scale embedding of open source code in products will create a series of R&D management issues:
- A careless selection of copyright licenses will hide intellectual property legal risks and transform into a stumbling block for businesses to expand overseas markets.
- Various teams select a variety of similar open source software that brings colossal management costs.
- In the early stages of product development, how to select the right code among various similar open source components? Picking the wrong cryptocurrency libraries, direction can lead to a dilemma of incompatibility among the program ecology and the industry, and face the challenge of giving up rewriting or continuing to go down.
- The source code will inevitably be altered throughout product development. Is the updated commercial code is closed source or open source? As time passes, the community version is updated and iterated, and the closed source continues, it suggests that resources will be repeatedly invested and non-value-added code integration. In contrast, open-source programming indicates the loss of product competitiveness.
Active open-source does not necessarily mean that communities can accept it. It needs a massive amount of feedback code for a long time to build credibility and influence, and the community managers in the organizations can be cultivated and exercised. However, the increase in the personal visibility of community managers will also increase the risk of being poached by headhunting organizations.
About the Company:
With Open Weaver, you can effortlessly assign appropriate access to individual projects, repositories, and branches to given teams or individual developers. In addition, you can also use different user directories: internal in Bitbucket, JIRA crowd server, internal LDAP (e.g. Active Directory).